User talk:Calinet6

Welcome!
I'm already getting FUD on my last reddit post on biwiring. My claims are even loftier on the FAQ. I decided to write each page as an article instead of plain jane answers. I figure if I had to limit myself to that I might as well just edit wikipedia. For this wiki to have a reason to exist outside of wikipedia, for me, means being different.

in either case I would like for there to be some kind of bylaws that everyone has to live by, almost like on hydrogen audio. except I hope we can be much more welcoming and forgiving. For example, opinions must be backed up either by a reference or by a combination of explanation and laying out how to reproduce the claimed results.

case in point: in my faq pages I tried to explain why certain recordings or equipment did what they did, and exactly which recordings to use.

Galtthedestroyer 23:36, December 11, 2011 (UTC)

I'm starting to regret showing you this Wiki. Effectively, I agree with the FUD that you're getting on reddit for the most part, and it's not FUD, it's simply rationality. If you would like to restrict yourself to a very advanced and unmeasurable set of recommendations, so be it, but don't expect it to be useful or relevant to many people. You're welcome to continue writing about your recommendations, but try to organize them in a way that it's obvious that they're advanced topics so we don't scare away new users who are interested in learning and skeptical of audiophile claims. Basically I want you to have a section for the very high end discussions you're having so they don't get in the way of learning what's actually important up to a certain level. Sorry if I offend, but we really have to separate out the "audiophilia" from a simple and good audio education.

Calinet6 23:54, December 11, 2011 (UTC)